Rwanda and its development partners have a well-articulated set of interlocking structures for policy dialogue and aid coordination, including a Development Partners Coordination Group (bi-monthly), a Budget Support Harmonization Group (quarterly) and 8 Implementation Working Groups to address cross-cutting issues under the national development plan, and a series of Sector Working Groups.
Published in Dialogue mechanisms
This study, commissioned by the German development agency GTZ for Accra, reviewed mutual accountability mechanisms in 19 countries, with a special focus on Rwanda, Mozambique and Vietnam.  While on first sight, progress is limited, it concludes that more pieces of the puzzle are in place than is generally assumed.  It notes that the key elements are: (i) a shared agenda, with clear, specified goals and mutual commitments; (ii) a process for monitoring and reviewing progress; and (iii) a process of debate, dialogue and negotiation.  It notes that, other than the ‘soft’ reputational or relational incentives, there is still little enforceability, particularly in respect of donor behaviour.  Involvement of domestic stakeholders in accountability processes is still relatively weak.  The study suggests that critical success factors for mutual accountability include confidence and trust, coherence, capacity, information and credible incentives.
Monday, 12 October 2009 13:40

Rwanda Aid Policy

The Rwanda Aid Policy was approved by the Rwandan government in July 2006.  It sets out the governments policies for ensuring that aid has the maximum impact on economic development and poverty reduction.  It contains an analysis of existing constraints on aid effectiveness (e.g., capacity problems, lack of predictability of aid, high transaction costs), and sets out a series of objectives, guiding principles and specific policies for improving aid effectiveness.  In a section on preferred aid modalities, it expresses its preference for unearmarked budget support, sector budget support and projects that are both on-plan and on-budget.
Published in Action Plans
This study, commissioned by the German development agency GTZ for Accra, reviewed mutual accountability mechanisms in 19 countries, with a special focus on Rwanda, Mozambique and Vietnam. While on first sight, progress is limited, it concludes that more pieces of the puzzle are in place than is generally assumed. It notes that the key elements are: (i) a shared agenda, with clearly specified goals and mutual commitments; (ii) a process for monitoring and reviewing progress; and (iii) a process of debate, dialogue and negotiation. It notes that, other than the 'soft' reputational or relational incentives, there is still little enforceability, particularly in respect of donor behaviour. Involvement of domestic stakeholders in accountability processes is still relatively weak. The study suggests that critical success factors for mutual accountability include confidence and trust, coherence, capacity, information and credible incentives.
This Briefing Paper prepared by the NGO Trocaire contains a useful summary of lessons learned and guidance on how to strengthen civil society participation in development policy making. Summarising Trocaire's experience in two countries - Honduras and Rwanda - it provides practical advice in areas such as building cross-organisational advocacy teams, producing and disseminating effective research reports; focusing on content rather than process; and balancing an 'insider' and 'outsider' approach. The Paper is pitched at northern and southern CSOs.