|
Country profile
Timor-Leste is one of the world’s poorest nations, ranking 158th of 179 on the UN’s Human Development Index and with half the population living on less than a dollar a day. The population of 1.1 million is growing rapidly, at over 3% per annum. Nearly half of the children are underweight, and only 38% of the population has access to an improved water source. Forty percent have never attended school. Despite gradual improvements in government services, only two of the MDGs are currently on track – primary education and gender equality. The population remains highly vulnerable to disease, natural disaster and conflict.
Timor-Leste has access to substantial oil revenues, which peaked at US$100m per month, but is struggling to translate this into effective development expenditure and non-oil growth. Three quarters of the population depend on subsistence agriculture, and unemployment may be as high as 50%.
The national development agenda is set out in a Development Vision 2020, but implementation has been disrupted by political volatility. A National Recovery Strategy was adopted in 2007, following by a National Priorities Process in 2008, with a structure of seven working groups to improve alignment at the sectoral level. A new medium-term Strategic Development Plan is currently under preparation. Development planning and aid management are led by the National Directorate of Planning and External Assistance Coordination (NDPEAC) in the Ministry of Planning and Finance.
In 2008, Timor-Leste received a total of US$236.4 million in ODA, with Australia, Japan and Portugal the largest donors. Aid accounts for around 30% of the national budget. In a ‘donor-heavy’ environment, the government has been trying to strengthen its leadership over aid coordination. It chairs annual Timor-Leste Development Partners Meetings, and has created an Aid Effectiveness Directorate in the Ministry of Finance. Although it has not participated in the Paris Declaration monitoring process, it is piloting the OECD-DAC Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations, and undertakes periodic reviews of implementation.
|